鉑電阻溫度傳感器現場檢定和實驗室檢定不確定度評定對比分析
DOI:
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號:

基金項目:

中國氣象局山洪地質災害防治氣象保障工程省級裝備保障能力(計量檢定能力)建設項目資助


Comparative Analysis of Uncertainty Evaluation of Platinum Resistor Temperature Sensors between Onsite and Laboratory Verification Results
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統計
  • |
  • 參考文獻
  • |
  • 相似文獻
  • |
  • 引證文獻
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評論
    摘要:

    目前我國自動氣象站鉑電阻溫度傳感器的檢定方式有現場檢定和實驗室檢定兩種。根據《JJG(氣象)0022015自動氣象站鉑電阻溫度傳感器檢定規程》的指導方法,分別對相同的鉑電阻溫度傳感器開展現場檢定和實驗室檢定,并通過GUM法對兩種檢定方式的檢定結果進行測量不確定度評定,對比兩種檢定方式的測量不確定度,結果表明現場檢定中測量重復性引入的不確定度和測量設備引入的不確定度較實驗室檢定更高。分析兩種檢定方式的測量不確定度產生差異的原因,建議國家級自動氣象站的鉑電阻傳感器采用實驗室檢定的方式開展計量檢定工作。

    Abstract:

    At present, there are two types of verification of platinum resistance temperature sensors in automatic meteorological stations in China,i.e., onsite verification and laboratory verification. As instructed in the related verification regulations (JJG (Meteorology) 0022015 Platinum Resistance Temperature Sensor of Automatic Weather Station), onsite verification and laboratory verification are separately performed for the same platinum resistance temperature sensor, and the measurement uncertainty is determined using the GUM (Guide to the Uncertainty in Measurement) method based on the results of both types of verification. The result shows that the uncertainty evaluation of onsite verification is higher than that of laboratory verification. The causes of differences in measurement uncertainty between the two types of verification are analyzed. It is suggested that the laboratory verification should be used in the verification of platinum resistance temperature sensors for automatic meteorological stations.

    參考文獻
    相似文獻
    引證文獻
引用本文

龔熙,曾濤,王延東,劉園園.鉑電阻溫度傳感器現場檢定和實驗室檢定不確定度評定對比分析[J].氣象科技,2020,48(1):76~80

復制
分享
文章指標
  • 點擊次數:
  • 下載次數:
  • HTML閱讀次數:
  • 引用次數:
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-18
  • 定稿日期:2019-05-31
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發布日期: 2020-02-26
  • 出版日期:
您是第位訪問者
技術支持:北京勤云科技發展有限公司
午夜欧美大片免费观看,欧美激情综合五月色丁香,亚洲日本在线视频观看,午夜精品福利在线
>