太陽總輻射表校準方法比較
DOI:
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號:

基金項目:

中國氣象局氣候變化專項(CCSF201439)資助


Comparison of Calibration Methods for Pyranometers
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統計
  • |
  • 參考文獻
  • |
  • 相似文獻
  • |
  • 引證文獻
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評論
    摘要:

    介紹了5種總輻射表的校準方法,比較了這些方法的優點和不足。針對不同等級的總輻射表,采用不同的校準方法,對其進行量值傳遞,以滿足不同用戶的需求。通過對不同方法的對比試驗,結果表明遮/不遮法校準的總輻射表靈敏度的準確度優于成分和法,而成分和法優于平行比對法,以人工光源校準誤差最大。我國總輻射表的校準以太陽為光源,按WMO的規定在儀器的正常使用狀態下進行。使用遮/不遮法校準國家散射輻射測量標準,用成分和法校準省級工作級標準總輻射表,用平行比對法校準臺站用工作級總輻射表,確保了太陽輻射觀測數據的準確可靠。

    Abstract:

    Five calibration methods of pyranometers are introduced and their advantages and disadvantages are compared. For different classes of pyranometers, there are different calibration methods to transfer values in order to meet the needs of different customers. By comparison of different methods, the results show that the sensitivity accuracy of the pyranometers calibrated by the shaded/unshaded method is better than those by using the component summation technique. Likewise, the component summation method is better than the sidebyside comparison method. The error of the method using an artificial source to calibrate pyranometers in the laboratory is the maxmium. According to WMO CIMO Guide, pyranometers should be calibrated only in the position of using sun as light source. The shaded/unshaded method is used to calibrate the national diffuse irradiance standard pyranometer, and the component summation method to calibrate the provincial standard pyranometer, the side by side comparison method to calibrate the working pyranometer in stations. All these methods ensure the accuracy and reliability of solar radiation measurement data.

    參考文獻
    相似文獻
    引證文獻
引用本文

楊云,丁蕾,權繼梅,邊澤強.太陽總輻射表校準方法比較[J].氣象科技,2015,43(2):175~180

復制
分享
文章指標
  • 點擊次數:
  • 下載次數:
  • HTML閱讀次數:
  • 引用次數:
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-10
  • 定稿日期:2014-07-03
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發布日期: 2015-04-28
  • 出版日期:
您是第位訪問者
技術支持:北京勤云科技發展有限公司
午夜欧美大片免费观看,欧美激情综合五月色丁香,亚洲日本在线视频观看,午夜精品福利在线
>