2011年梅汛期兩次強降雨過程對比分析
DOI:
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號:

基金項目:


Comparative Analysis of Two Heavy Rainfall in Meiyu Period in 2011
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統計
  • |
  • 參考文獻
  • |
  • 相似文獻
  • |
  • 引證文獻
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評論
    摘要:

    用NCEP 2.5°×2.5°的日平均資料和實況雨量資料,對2011年梅雨期中兩次強降雨過程進行了對比分析。結果表明:①200 hPa西風急流在長江中下游上空的位相相反,前者處于高壓脊底部的偏西氣流,后者處于槽前的西南氣流。500 hPa高緯地區的兩槽一脊型位置不同,前者南支槽比較淺,而后者比較深。700 hPa前者江淮切變線是偏北風與西南風構成的切變線,而后者是偏東風與西南風構成的切變線。②前者的水汽由孟加拉灣的偏西氣流和副高西側的東南氣流共同提供,而后者水汽主要來源于孟加拉灣的偏西氣流。③梅雨鋒結構主要表現為濕度對比、溫度梯度較小,鋒區都有先北抬后南壓的過程,前者鋒區位置偏南,北抬后穩定維持時間長,而后者鋒區位置偏北,穩定維持的時間短。前者干冷空氣低層弱,高層強,主要來源于對流層中高層,同時鋒面北側沒有明顯的冷空氣補充,而后者干冷空氣主要來源于對流層高層,同時鋒面北側還存在冷鋒鋒區。

    Abstract:

    Using the daily average data of NCEP 2.5°×2.5° and observed rainfall, on the base of comparative analysis of two heavy rainfall events in the Meiyu period in 2011, it is concluded: (1) The phases of the west jet over the Yangtze River for the two rainfall events were contrary, the former in the westerly airflow on the bottom of high pressure ridge, and the latter in the southwest flow before the trough. The circulation pattern (two troughs and one ridge) at 500 hPa were different,with the south trough of the former being shallow, and that of the latter being deep. The shear line at 700hPa of the former was formed by north and southwest winds and that of the latter was by east and southwest winds. (2) The water vapor of the former came from the west of the Bay of Bengal and the southeast of Subtropical; that of the latter came from the west of the Bay of Bengal mainly. (3) For both cases, the structure of the Meiyu front exhibited small humidity difference and temperature gradient, and the frontal zone moved northward first and southward, but the frontal zone position of the former was further south and that of the latter was further north; the duration of the former was long and that of the latter was short. The dry cold air of the former, which mainly came from the high level troposphere, was weak at lower levels and strong at upper levels, at the same time no clear cold air added to the north front. The dry cold air of the latter mainly came from upper levels, and there was a cold front frontal zone to the north of the front.

    參考文獻
    相似文獻
    引證文獻
引用本文

沈曉玲.2011年梅汛期兩次強降雨過程對比分析[J].氣象科技,2012,40(6):983~989

復制
分享
文章指標
  • 點擊次數:
  • 下載次數:
  • HTML閱讀次數:
  • 引用次數:
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2011-08-11
  • 定稿日期:2012-01-04
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發布日期: 2012-12-11
  • 出版日期:
您是第位訪問者
技術支持:北京勤云科技發展有限公司
午夜欧美大片免费观看,欧美激情综合五月色丁香,亚洲日本在线视频观看,午夜精品福利在线
>