沙氏指數計算方案探討
DOI:
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號:

基金項目:


Calculation Schemes for Showalter Index
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統計
  • |
  • 參考文獻
  • |
  • 相似文獻
  • |
  • 引證文獻
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評論
    摘要:

    從沙氏指數的物理定義出發,給出了計算沙氏指數的4種方案并進行了誤差分析。A方案沒有考慮水汽凝結潛熱,計算結果誤差大;B方案雖然考慮水汽凝結潛熱,但計算方法沒有考慮濕絕熱線的曲率等問題,計算結果雖優于A方案,但誤差仍較大;C 方案不僅考慮水汽凝結潛熱,并從計算方法上作了改進 ,不僅考慮了濕絕熱線的曲率等問題,同時避免了由氣壓直接求取氣溫造成誤差較大的問題,計算結果優于A、B方案,比較理想,可在實際工作中使用;D方案由假絕熱方程經過轉化求得上升氣塊的溫度,然后算出沙氏指數,雖然精確,但計算復雜,實際應用較困難

    Abstract:

    According to the physical definition of Showalter Index (SI), four Calculation Schemes are proposed. Scheme A does not consider water vapor latent heat, resulting in large calculation errors. Although Scheme B considers the condensation latent heat, the curvature of wet adiabat is not considered in the computational method. Scheme B is superior to Scheme A, but the errors are still large. Scheme C not only considers the condensation latent heat, but also improves the computational method, considering the curvature of wet adiabat and the errors resulted from the derived temperature directly from pressure, with the result being superior to both Scheme A and B plan. Scheme D obtains the temperature of ascending air parcels through transformation by the pseudoadiabatic equation, and then figures out SI index. It is more precise, but its calculation is very complex, difficult to be used widely. Therefore Scheme C is preferred, can be put to operational use.

    參考文獻
    相似文獻
    引證文獻
引用本文

張年成,朱俊峰,陳紅萍,郭英蓮,葛坤芳.沙氏指數計算方案探討[J].氣象科技,2007,35(2):171~174

復制
分享
文章指標
  • 點擊次數:
  • 下載次數:
  • HTML閱讀次數:
  • 引用次數:
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-08
  • 定稿日期:2006-06-23
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發布日期:
  • 出版日期:
您是第位訪問者
技術支持:北京勤云科技發展有限公司
午夜欧美大片免费观看,欧美激情综合五月色丁香,亚洲日本在线视频观看,午夜精品福利在线
>